latest news

more articles

new about market

more articles

Learn something new

more articles

community's choice

more articles

community's choice

more articles

CoinwaftNews

Former FTX CEO SBF’s Sentencing Plea For 6.5 Years Amidst Allegations of Giving Investment Advice in Prison

5 Mins

By Coinwaft Editorial

February 28, 2024 at 3:09 PM

Last updated

February 28, 2024 at 3:09 PM

Former FTX CEO SBF’s Sentencing Plea For 6.5 Years Amidst Allegations of Giving Investment Advice in Prison

Source: GettyImages

The former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has petitioned the United States District Court in Manhattan for a prison sentence ranging between five and a quarter to six and a half years. 

This plea comes as SBF faces a daunting maximum sentence of 110 years following his conviction on multiple counts of fraud and money laundering in November of the preceding year.

SBF’s legal counsel strongly opposed the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), which advocates for a staggering 100-year sentence, labeling it as “barbaric.” 

They argued that such a punitive measure fails to account for crucial mitigating factors, including SBF’s status as a first-time offender and the prospect of full restitution to victims, underlining a zero harm done to customers, lenders, and investors.

“Sam is a 31-year-old, first-time, non-violent offender, who was joined in the conduct at issue by at least four other culpable individuals, in a matter where victims are poised to recover—were always poised to recover—a hundred cents on the dollar,”

emphasized SBF’s legal filing.

SBF’s legal team articulated a multifaceted defense strategy, leveraging various legal arguments and mitigating factors to advocate for a more lenient sentence. 

Central to their plea was that an “appropriate method of arriving at a just sentence” should consider an adjusted offense level based on “zero loss,” resulting in an advisory Guidelines range of 63-78 months. 

They emphasized that the harm to customers, lenders, and investors amounted to zero, given the FTX bankruptcy estate’s assurance of full restitution to victims.

“An appropriate method of arriving at a just sentence would be to consider an adjusted offense level based on ‘zero loss,’ resulting in an advisory Guidelines range of 63-78 months,”

asserted SBF’s legal filing.

Moreover, they emphasized the solvency of FTX and FTX.US at the time of bankruptcy filing, citing the bankruptcy estate’s claim of possessing over $10 billion in assets, which exceeded the exchange’s $8 billion deficit. 

This financial context, they argued, mitigated the severity of SBF’s culpability and warranted a more lenient sentencing approach.

“When all factors are considered, including Sam’s charitable works and demonstrated commitment to others, a sentence that returns Sam promptly to a productive role in society would be sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of sentencing,”

the lawyers emphasized.

This stance was bolstered by many heartfelt testimonials from friends and family, portraying SBF as deeply committed to philanthropy and societal well-being.

Related: The Legal Saga Continues: FTX’s Former CEO Denied Sentencing Extension

Testimonials and Supportive Evidence

SBF’s sentencing memorandum featured an array of letters of support from friends, family, and associates, portraying him in a favorable light. 

These testimonials depicted SBF as a compassionate individual dedicated to philanthropy and societal welfare, challenging his characterization as a “sociopath” or “notorious fraudster.”

“Those who know Sam see someone who ‘cares deeply about other people.’ Who exhibits ‘kindness and loyalty.’ Whose ‘heart [is] in the right place.’ Someone who ‘has always been dedicated to doing good in the world,'”

the filing highlighted.

Jamie Forrest, an adviser to Purpose Africa, a research entity focused on therapeutics, also submitted a letter written when Bankman-Fried invited them to the Bahamas in early 2022. 

“Bankman-Fried’s vision reflected a man whose values were deeply rooted in global justice, fairness, and human dignity.”

he wrote.

Some letters came from inmates, stating how Bankman-Fried is being frequently targeted for hazing, harassment, and assault, leading to general extortion attempts because of his rumored net worth.

The supportive letters encompassed a broad spectrum, ranging from family members to former colleagues and fellow inmates, emphasizing SBF’s positive qualities and challenging negative portrayals.

Allegations of Investment Advice in Prison

Reports from the New York Times and other sources alleged that despite his incarceration, SBF has been engaging in discussions with prison guards, offering investment advice and encouraging them to invest in Solana’s SOL token, a cryptocurrency with which he has a significant history.

This revelation adds another layer of complexity to SBF’s legal saga, showing the surreal comparison between his ongoing legal battles and purported activities behind bars. 

It raises pertinent questions about the boundaries between legal sanctions and extralegal influences within correctional settings and shows systemic challenges within the criminal justice system.

SBF’s legal team also mounted vigorous challenges against various enhancements recommended in the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), disputing their applicability or evidential support. 

They refuted perjury claims during the trial and contested allegations related to tampering with witnesses and auto-deleting messages, asserting that these enhancements lacked substantiation.

“Neither the government nor Probation identifies a single specific line of alleged perjurious testimony, which is enough to reject this enhancement,”

the filing asserted.

Furthermore, they drew comparisons between SBF’s case and those of other high-profile individuals, such as Bernie Madoff and Elizabeth Holmes, to contextualize the nature and severity of SBF’s conviction, arguing for a sentencing approach aligned with precedent cases.

In essence, SBF’s legal defense sought to present a comprehensive narrative that balanced mitigating factors, testimonials of character, and challenges to legal assertions, aiming to secure a more favorable outcome for his complex legal entanglement.

Check Also: New Report: Sam Bankman-Fried’s Father’s Role in FTX’s Cryptocurrency and Legal Defense Unveiled

Disclaimer: Coinwaft is a crypto media platform providing cryptocurrency news, analysis, and trading information. The content of this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial, legal, or investment advice. Readers are advised once again to research or consult a financial expert before making any financial decision.

© 2025 Coinwaft. All Rights Reserved.

Coinwaft Editorial

Coinwaft Editorial

Editorial

Coinwaft Editorial, the official voice of Coinwaft. Our team of experienced financial journalists and blockchain experts delivers authoritative, well-researched content on digital assets, market trends, and emerging technologies. With a commitment to accuracy and objectivity, we provide our readers with comprehensive coverage of the rapidly evolving crypto space.

Author profile

Get the daily newsletter that helps thousands of investors get early alpha and understand the markets.

By pressing the "Subscribe button" you agree with our Privacy Policy.

© 2025 Coinwaft. All Right Reserved.

Coinwaft uses cookies to offer a better browsing experience. By clicking accept, you consent to our privacy policy & use of cookies.